566 U.S. 463 (2012)

A 2012 United States Supreme Court opinion in which the Court held that of have the authority to raise, sua sponte, a forfeited timeliness defense to a habeas petition.  However, since the State deliberately had waived its defense, the Court held that the Tenth Circuit abused its discretion when it dismissed the petition as untimely.

jdjungle

Recent Posts

Assign

To transfer, make over or set over to another. To appoint, select, or designate for…

6 days ago

Assertive Conduct

Nonverbal conduct which is intended to be the equivalent of a spoken assertion.

6 days ago

Assault (Torts Law)

A person is liable for the intentional tort of "assault" if (1) he/she acts intending…

6 days ago

Assault (Criminal Law)

The creation in another of the fear of bodily harm. As the California Supreme Court…

6 days ago

Ybarra v. Spangard

25 Cal.2d 486 (1944) One-Sentence Takeaway: The California Supreme Court applied res ipsa loquitur to…

6 days ago

Wright v. Newman

266 Ga. 519, 467 S.E.2d 533 (1996). Facts: Kim Newman (P) sought child support from…

6 days ago